| The East Tennessee Episcopalian Sept. 1999 |
| |
| Lutherans Approve
Full Communion With Episcopalians
by James Solheim After three days of civil but intense debate, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) approved by nearly a 70 percent majority a document that opens the way to full communion with the Episcopal Churchand may provide new energy for the ecumenical movement in a new century. The final vote
of 716 to 317 met the requirements of two-thirds of voting members at
the Churchwide Assembly in Denver. The document, Called to Common Mission
(CCM), was written after the ELCA failed by 6 votes to approve a Concordat
of Agreement at its 1997 assembly. A few weeks earlier the Episcopal
Churchs General Convention had overwhelmingly approved the Concordat.
An Incredible
Step In a prepared statement, read at a news conference by Bishop Christopher Epting of Iowa, Presiding Bishop Frank T. Griswold said, "I pray that our response can be positive. The 30 long years of conversation and dialogue have come to fruition. The promise of our deepening life together offers real hope for the broken world. The test of our full communion will be our faithfulness to the Gospel in mission and witness, in prayer and fellowship at Gods altar. We ask the Holy Spirit to lead us in the days ahead, to unfold and deepen our relationship." "This is a big step for usbut were not dancing yet," said Presiding Bishop H. George Anderson of the ELCA, pointing out that the document must be approved by the Episcopal Church. "We live in hope." Yet the action to approve full communion with the 50,000-member Moravian Church, with only 11 negative votes, as well as with the Episcopal Church, is "a great step in our ecumenical understanding," Anderson added. "And it is not the end. We will continue to press forward." Perry cautioned that the majority who favored full communion should be "prayerful and sensitive" in recognition that over 30 percent of the assembly voted against CCM. "Healing is a part of our new life together." He said that the educational task, helping Episcopalians understand the new document and how it differs from the Concordat of 1997, will begin almost immediately. Epting said that there are "substantial changes but ones that are consistent with the document" and he did not anticipate much opposition among Episcopalians. A last-minute amendment gave Lutherans some "wiggle room" on the requirement that bishops preside at all ordinations. While agreeing with "the historic practice whereby the bishop is representative of the wider church," and should "regularly" preside, it concedes that there might be emergency situations in which that would not be possible. A
First For an American Church Prof. J. Robert Wright of the General Seminary in New York, an advisor to the ecumenical office and a partner in the writing process, agreed. In an interview he said that "Lutherans have bridged the gap of the Reformation and have given a powerful new energy to the ecumenical movement for the new millennium." He expressed his hope that the General Convention would "embrace their decision" next summer. Issue
Dominates Agenda Marty said that
the drafting team had been sensitive to those who had serious reservations
about CCM but, after exploring a number of options, it was clear that
none would be acceptable to the Episcopalians. "All alternatives
would leave us short of full communion," he told the assembly in
an opening plenary. He said that CCM spells out the Lutheran understanding
of one ministry of Word and Sacrament and that adopting the historic
episcopate would not be a threat to Lutheran traditions or doctrine.. The Rev. Nancy Curtis of Indiana said that CCM provided exciting possibilities for her ministry in rural northeast Indiana. During a congregational study of the proposal, members noted the similarities between the two churches, especially in liturgy, while expressing some concern about how authority is expressed by leaders in the two churches. Yet they concluded that "we are free as few others" to adapt to innovation and to "be a church in full communion in ways not possible for others." Mission
or Division? CCM is not a
mission document, it is a failed paradigm that is more interested in
maintenance than mission, argued a man from Ohio. No, CCM provides us
a unified Christian witness as we face a new millennium, counters a
woman from Florida. And it gives us new partners in mission, argued
another. The
Wider Context While it is clear
that the ELCA has a serious challenge to heal the clear divisions that
emerged in considering CCM, early signs suggested that the opponents
would accept the will of the majority "in Christian love"
and move forward.
|